| 列表 |
|
|
In recent years, railroads have been combining with each other,
merging into super systems, causing heightened concerns about monopoly.
As recently as 1995, the top four railroads accounted for under 70 percent of
the total ton-miles moved by rails. Next year, after a series of mergers
is completed, just four railroads will control well over 90 percent of all the
freight moved by major rail carriers.
Supporters of the new supersystems argue that these mergers
will allow for substantial cost reductions and better coordinated
service. Any threat of monopoly, they argue, is removed by fierce competition from trucks. But many shippers
complain that for heavy bulk commodities traveling long distances, such as
coal, chemicals, and grain, trucking is too costly and the railroads therefore
have them by the throat.
The vast consolidation within the rail industry means
that most shippers are served by only one rail company. Railroads typically
charge such "captive" shippers 20 to 30 percent more than they
do when another railroad is competing
for the business. Shippers who feel they are being overcharged have the right to
appeal to the federal government's Surface Transportation Board for rate
relief, but the process is expensive, time consuming, and will work only in
truly extreme cases.
Railroads justify rate discrimination against captive
shippers on the grounds that in the long run it reduces everyone's cost.
If
railroads charged all customers the same average rate, they argue, shippers who
have the option of switching to trucks or other forms of transportation
would do so, leaving remaining customers to shoulder the cost of keeping up the
line. It's a theory to which many economists subscribe, but in
practice it often leaves railroads in the position of determining which
companies will flourish and which will fail. "Do we really
want railroads to be the arbiters of who wins and who loses
in the marketplace?" asks Martin Bercovici, a
Many captive shippers also worry they will soon be hit with a
round of huge rate increases. The railroad industry as a whole, despite its
brightening fortunes, still does not earn enough to cover the cost of
the capital it must invest to keep up with its surging traffic. Yet
railroads continue to borrow billions to acquire one another, with Wall Street
cheering them on. Consider the $10.2 billion bid by
51. According to
those who support mergers railway monopoly is unlikely because ________.
[A] cost reduction is based on competition
[B] services call for cross-trade coordination
[C] outside competitors
will continue to exist
[D] shippers will have the railway by the throat
52. What is many
captive shippers' attitude towards the consolidation in the rail
industry?
[A] Indifferent.
[B] Supportive.
[C] Indignant.
[D] Apprehensive.
53. It can be
inferred from paragraph 3 that ________.
[A] shippers will be charged less without a rival railroad
[B] there will soon be only one railroad company nationwide
[C] overcharged shippers are unlikely to appeal for rate relief
[D] a government board ensures fair play in railway business
54. The word
"arbiters" (line 6, paragraph 4) most probably refers to those
________.
[A] who work as coordinators
[B] who function as judges
[C] who supervise transactions
[D] who determine the price
55. According to
the text, the cost increase in the rail industry is mainly caused by ________.
[A] the continuing acquisition
[B] the growing traffic
[C] the cheering Wall Street
[D] the shrinking market